Arguably the most important part of any decentralized project is how it will operate in a decentralized manner. As we get closer to the launch of PsyOptions on Solana mainnet, I think it is time for us to start thinking about the formation of the PsyOptions DAO. How will governance work? How will the core team and contributors work together to build a great product? How will we approach collaborations with other projects? These are just a few of the questions that will inevitably arise as we get into the thick of things.
We will not be able to cover all of these questions within one forum topic, however, we can start chipping away one by one. With that said, I would like to start the discussion on how PsyOptions governance will work.
From my understanding, there is currently little to no governance infrastructure for the Solana Ecosystem. Solana Labs is in the process of developing this infrastructure, and the PsyOptions Core Team will be assisting where we can. We should note just how early we are both as builders and as a community to the Solana ecosystem. There will be growing pains, and those who come after us will be able to build on top of the things we create now.
To start the discussion on governance, I would like to present the governance structures of two protocols I think do it well: Synthetix and Inverse Finance. As a brief reminder, Synthetix is a synthetic asset protocol on Ethereum(i.e. Syntehtify) while Inverse Finance is a suite of decentralized finance tools that famously took back airdropped tokens from receivers who were not participating in governance.
The standard approach to governance typically works something like this: you hold a governance token and when there is an improvement proposal up for vote, you simply vote with your coins. Simple enough.
However, what is interesting to me is how Synthetix and Inverse Finance both incorporate “delegation”. An example of this is how $INV holders can delegate their vote to another individual(the Delegate) and once the Delegate attains 1000 community member votes, they are able to launch a proposal that can then be voted on by the wider community. $INV holders can re-delegate their coins to a new Delegate at any time.
Synthetix takes this system a bit further, as their DAO is actually composed of multiple DAOs. There is the Spartan Council, the Protocol DAO, Synthetix DAO, Ambassador DAO, and finally Grants DAO. Each of these DAOs have their own duties, but within this discussion we will focus on the Spartan Council and the Ambassador DAO.
From the Synthetix docs page on governance:
“The Spartan Council is a governing DAO which currently comprises 8 members who are elected for the duration of an epoch by community staking participants. The Spartan Council is responsible for conducting SIP/SCCP interviews, debating the implications of proposed changes, coordinating protocol changes with the protocol DAO and hosting periodic community governance meetings in order to best represent and protect the wider Synthetix stakeholders.
The SC, like other DAO roles, are paid a stipend by the Synthetix DAO and conduct their duties on the relevant discord governance channels and utilises snapshots IPFS signature voting on the staking governance site. “
“Ambassadors are nominated community members who are appointed as a signer on a Gnosis multisig, their role is to gather support from Synthetix community members who delegate their governance tokens (from other external protocols) to the multisig, effectively empowering the Ambassadors to participate in external protocols governance systems which have a positive impact on the Synthetix ecosystem (i.e interoperable protocol features, listing of synthetix synths on DEX’s).
The Ambassadors are re-elected every epoch, and the members are paid a stipend by the sDAO during their tenure.”
There are two groups of “elected officials” within the Synthetix governance structure: the Spartan Council and Ambassadors. In summation of the previous excerpts, the Spartan Council is elected to hash out all the details surrounding protocol improvements, and act in the best interest of the Synthetix community. The Ambassadors are essentially delegates as discussed in the Inverse Finance section of this post, except they are delegated coins from other protocols to then go vote in the best interest of the Synthetix community. Example: Synthetix community members would delegate their $AAVE to an ambassador who then goes to vote on proposals within AAVE that would be beneficial to Syntehtix.
These systems of delegation and elected DAO officials sound like a simple reinvention of democracy, however, I think they are worth considering as options for PsyOptions’ governance structure. All governance structures have both their merits and flaws, and it is our responsibility as early members of the PsyOptions community to have an open discussion on these matters as we begin to lay the foundation for what’s to come.
Thank you for reading.
EDIT: I forgot to include links to Inverse Finance and Synthetix’s governance documentation.
- Synthetix Governance: Governance - Synthetix System Documentation
- Inverse Finance Governance: âś… Governance - Inverse.finance